Skip to content

Bump version to 0.1.2 - #55

Merged
JoshCLWren merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
bump-0.1.2
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

Bump version to 0.1.2#55
JoshCLWren merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
bump-0.1.2

Conversation

@JoshCLWren

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The v0.1.2 tag failed its release-workflow version check because pyproject.toml still said 0.1.1. Every job that runs the check died 6s in, so the macOS build never reached a real step.

Bumps pyproject.toml to 0.1.2 and the matching version of the virtual project in uv.lock, which uv sync --locked validates on every runner.

The lock is edited in place rather than regenerated: a full uv lock rewrites all 25 registry entries to whatever index the local machine has configured. Verified with UV_INDEX_URL=https://pypi.org/simple uv sync --locked, which passes with only the single version line changed.

After merge, the v0.1.2 tag needs to move to the new commit to re-trigger the release.

The release workflow asserts the tag matches pyproject.toml, so v0.1.2
failed its version check six seconds in, before any build step ran.

uv.lock carries the project's own version, so it is bumped in step or
'uv sync --locked' fails on the runners. Edited in place rather than
regenerated, to avoid rewriting every registry entry.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@JoshCLWren, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 16 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4c029fd2-ca0b-4855-8e7f-1eb617d28958

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46d5c00 and ee69779.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

A developer with UV_INDEX_URL or a pip.conf mirror set had every uv
command rewrite all 25 registry entries in uv.lock to that private index.
Committing one breaks CI and any clone that cannot reach the mirror, and
it was silent enough to need reverting before every commit.

A default [[tool.uv.index]] in pyproject.toml takes precedence over the
environment variable, so the lock stays reproducible for everyone without
per-machine setup. Verified by running a full 'uv lock' with a mirror
exported: the result is byte-identical to the committed lock, and every
registry entry is pypi.org.

The pre-commit guard stays as a backstop for anyone on an older uv.
@JoshCLWren
JoshCLWren merged commit 365f838 into main Aug 8, 2026
7 checks passed
@JoshCLWren
JoshCLWren deleted the bump-0.1.2 branch August 8, 2026 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant