Use implicit tree for error search#562
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Keno
force-pushed
the
kf/cursorerrortraverse
branch
from
1c788c5 to
c339f14
Compare
This builds on top of #560 and replaces the use of `SyntaxNode` in hooks.jl by the new lower-level cursor APIs. This avoid allocating two completely separate representations of the syntax tree. As a result, the end-to-end parse time for error-containing code is between 1.5x (if the error is the first token) and 2x (if the error is the last token) faster than current master. However, the main motivation here is just to reduce coupling between the Expr-producing and SyntaxNode producing parts of the code.
Keno
force-pushed
the
kf/cursorerrortraverse
branch
from
c339f14 to
962b50d
Compare
c42f
pushed a commit
to JuliaLang/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2025
This builds on top of JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl#560 and replaces the use of `SyntaxNode` in hooks.jl by the new lower-level cursor APIs. This avoid allocating two completely separate representations of the syntax tree. As a result, the end-to-end parse time for error-containing code is between 1.5x (if the error is the first token) and 2x (if the error is the last token) faster than current master. However, the main motivation here is just to reduce coupling between the Expr-producing and SyntaxNode producing parts of the code.
topolarity
pushed a commit
to JuliaLang/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
This builds on top of JuliaLang/JuliaSyntax.jl#560 and replaces the use of `SyntaxNode` in hooks.jl by the new lower-level cursor APIs. This avoid allocating two completely separate representations of the syntax tree. As a result, the end-to-end parse time for error-containing code is between 1.5x (if the error is the first token) and 2x (if the error is the last token) faster than current master. However, the main motivation here is just to reduce coupling between the Expr-producing and SyntaxNode producing parts of the code.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This builds on top of #560 and replaces the use of
SyntaxNodein hooks.jl by the new lower-level cursor APIs. This avoid allocating two completely separate representations of the syntax tree.As a result, the end-to-end parse time for error-containing code is between 1.5x (if the error is the first token) and 2x (if the error is the last token) faster than current master. However, the main motivation here is just to reduce coupling between the Expr-producing and SyntaxNode producing parts of the code.