Skip to content

[pull] master from ggml-org:master#841

Merged
pull[bot] merged 4 commits intoLongLeCE:masterfrom
ggml-org:master
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

[pull] master from ggml-org:master#841
pull[bot] merged 4 commits intoLongLeCE:masterfrom
ggml-org:master

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Feb 2, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

teto and others added 4 commits February 2, 2026 16:55
Experimenting with AI, my environment gets messy fast and it's not
always easy to know what model my software is trying to load. This helps
with troubleshooting.

before:

Error: {
  code = 400,
  message = "model not found",
  type = "invalid_request_error"
}

After:

Error: {
  code = 400,
  message = "model 'toto' not found",
  type = "invalid_request_error"
}
* ggml-cpu: split across kv for faster TG

* simplify sinks application

* add ref impl
* jinja : add missing 'in' test to template engine (#19004)

The jinja template parser was missing the 'in' test from
global_builtins(), causing templates using reject("in", ...),
select("in", ...), or 'x is in(y)' to fail with
"selectattr: unknown test 'in'".

This broke tool-calling for Qwen3-Coder and any other model
whose chat template uses the 'in' test.

Added test_is_in supporting array, string, and object containment
checks, mirroring the existing 'in' operator logic in runtime.cpp.

Includes test cases for all three containment types plus
reject/select filter usage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* reuse test_is_in in binary op

---------

Co-authored-by: Sid Mohan <sidmohan0@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Xuan Son Nguyen <son@huggingface.co>
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 2, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Feb 2, 2026
@pull pull bot merged commit 0dfcd3b into LongLeCE:master Feb 2, 2026
48 of 50 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants