Conversation
…se.all in getStats Co-authored-by: yeboster <23556525+yeboster@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
💡 What: Replaced sequential
awaits with a concurrentPromise.allinsrc/lib/server/index.tsgetStatsmethod to resolve the waterfall problem.🎯 Why: The previous implementation sequentially awaited
metaNamesSdk.domainRepository.count(),getOwners(), andgetRecentDomains(), artificially blocking subsequent independent network requests and adding unnecessary round trip latency.📊 Impact: Significantly reduces the total latency and execution time for the
getStatsfunction by executing all independent blockchain and repository data retrieval calls concurrently.🔬 Measurement: Verify locally or synthetically monitor API request latency resolving
/api/statsendpoint, checking if time to resolve drops relative to sequential wait.No architectural changes made and code readability is preserved. Tested with the project's internal commands successfully (
pnpm test:unit --runandpnpm run check).PR created automatically by Jules for task 10071226063095734124 started by @yeboster