Open
Conversation
Author
1 task
I didn't mean to touch this file ...
Author
|
I'm told GitHub has a |
Author
|
Removed the |
This was referenced May 10, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GitHub doesn't seem to have a facility like Codeberg's where you can mark a pull request
WIPto explicitly prevent accidental merging. Not that anybody is likely to accidentally merge code from me, but it is also a useful way of communicating uncertainty.I'm sure this isn't correct, but I hope somebody may be able to suggest how it should be corrected. I've tried to find documentation for the recipe file format, but have been singularly unsuccessful. So this is just cobbled-together guesswork and surely wrong in places. If I knew which and how, I'd correct them, obviously, but I don't and I have no way of testing ....