-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
Dev/format inputinfo #888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev/format inputinfo #888
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @GACLove, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the handling of input parameters across the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a significant and beneficial refactoring of how input parameters are handled. By removing the rigid ShotConfig and introducing a flexible SekoTalkInputs dataclass with a UNSET default pattern, the code becomes more modular and easier to extend. The new approach of loading default parameters from default_input_info in the JSON configuration files is a clean way to manage defaults.
My review includes a critical fix for a duplicate field in a dataclass and a suggestion to improve maintainability by removing code duplication in a scheduler's __init__ method. Overall, this is a solid improvement to the codebase.
| "task": "rs2v", | ||
| "model_path":"/data/temp/SekoTalk-v2.7_beta1-bf16-step4", | ||
| "infer_steps": 4, | ||
| "model_path":"/data/temp/SekoTalk-v2.7_beta2-bf16-step4", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
model_path 不属于 rs2v 的, 建议放置到它的上层,clip 的 item 的配置中。
No description provided.