🧪 Testing code cov - not meant to be merge

[mdepasca-mqv]

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant
motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes #(issue)

Checklist:

• The pull request only contains commits that are focused and relevant to this change.
• I have added appropriate tests that cover the new/changed functionality.
• I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes.
• I have added entries to the changelog for any noteworthy additions, changes, fixes, or
  removals.
• I have added migration instructions to the upgrade guide (if needed).
• The changes follow the project's style guidelines and introduce no new warnings.
• The changes are fully tested and pass the CI checks.
• I have reviewed my own code changes.

[ystade]

As stated here the codecov action is currently not expected to work on forks, unfortunately.

[kayaercument]

As stated here the codecov action is currently not expected to work on forks, unfortunately.

I checked the issues in the codecov-action repository, and the very same error was reported previously. They mentioned a sync problem. Just to make sure, I created another fork and PR. I contacted the Codecov team about this. Hopefully, it will be resolved soon 🤞 .

[ystade]

As stated here the codecov action is currently not expected to work on forks, unfortunately.

I checked the issues in the codecov-action repository, and the very same error was reported previously. They mentioned a sync problem. Just to make sure, I created another fork and PR. I contacted the Codecov team about this. Hopefully, it will be resolved soon 🤞 .

Awesome, many thanks. Please, keep us posted.

[thomasrockhu-codecov]

@kayaercument @mdepasca-lrz do you mind re-running CI again? I think I made the fix for you

[burgholzer]

@kayaercument @mdepasca-lrz do you mind re-running CI again? I think I made the fix for you

Retriggered the old job, even pushed a new commit here; still fails with the same error.
Also retriggered in #154, which also still shows the same error.

[kayaercument]

Hey @thomasrockhu-codecov 👋 ,

Could you please take a look at it again? It still does not work

[thomasrockhu-codecov]

@kayaercument sorry about the delay here, it should work if you re-run CI now

[kayaercument]

@kayaercument sorry about the delay here, it should work if you re-run CI now

Thank you very much @thomasrockhu-codecov ! The test is running without a problem. @ystade @burgholzer Can you confirm?

[burgholzer]

Yeah, #154 now also has coverage data.
Thanks @thomasrockhu-codecov 🙏🏼

Closing this PR now.