Skip to content

727: change from postfix to prefix#741

Open
al-niessner wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
issue_727
Open

727: change from postfix to prefix#741
al-niessner wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
issue_727

Conversation

@al-niessner
Copy link
Contributor

@al-niessner al-niessner commented Mar 23, 2026

🗒️ Summary

Updated the ANTLR language

🤖 AI Assistance Disclosure

  • No AI assistance used
  • AI used for light assistance (e.g., suggestions, refactoring, documentation help, minor edits)
  • AI used for moderate content generation (AI generated some code or logic, but the developer authored or heavily revised the majority)
  • AI generated substantial portions of this code

Estimated % of code influenced by AI: ___ %

⚙️ Test Data and/or Report

♻️ Related Issues

Closes #727 which is the only subticket of #729

🤓 Reviewer Checklist

Reviewers: Please verify the following before approving this pull request.

Documentation and PR Content

  • Documentation: README, Wiki, or inline documentation (Sphinx, Javadoc, Docstrings) have been updated to reflect these changes.
  • Issue Traceability: The PR is linked to a valid GitHub Issue
  • PR Title: The PR title is "user-friendly" clearly identifying what is being fixed or the new feature being added, that if you saw it in the Release Notes for a tool, you would be able to get the gist of what was done.

Security & Quality

  • SonarCloud: Confirmed no new High or Critical security findings.
  • Secrets Detection: Verified that the Secrets Detection scan passed and no sensitive information (keys, tokens, PII) is exposed.
  • Code Quality: Code follows organization style guidelines and best practices for the specific language (e.g., PEP 8, Google Java Style).

Testing & Validation

  • Test Accuracy: Verified that test data is accurate, representative of real-world PDS4 scenarios, and sufficient for the logic being tested.
  • Coverage: Automated tests cover new logic and edge cases.
  • Local Verification: (If applicable) Successfully built and ran the changes in a local or staging environment.

Maintenance

  • Backward Compatibility: Confirmed that these changes do not break existing downstream dependencies or API contracts (or that breaking changes are clearly documented).

@al-niessner al-niessner requested a review from a team as a code owner March 23, 2026 18:26
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

As a user, I want the exists operator to be prepended to the query

1 participant