Skip to content

Update defaults for ne16 grids.#197

Open
mvdebolskiy wants to merge 2 commits into
NorESMhub:noresmfrom
mvdebolskiy:ne16-defaults-update
Open

Update defaults for ne16 grids.#197
mvdebolskiy wants to merge 2 commits into
NorESMhub:noresmfrom
mvdebolskiy:ne16-defaults-update

Conversation

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Goes together with NorESMhub/fates#51.

@mvdebolskiy mvdebolskiy added this to the NorESM3.0 milestone Apr 15, 2026
@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@rosiealice @JessicaNeedham are we still in need for 16pft datasets for ne16? Or now running with 78 ones is fine, do you know by any chance?

@JessicaNeedham
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mvdebolskiy , I'm actually not sure. I will try to figure this out. It is possible that with land use on the pft distribution in the surface datafile is not used but we need to confirm.

@JessicaNeedham
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mvdebolskiy my read of the code is that the FATES pft distributions in fixed biogeography mode with land use are coming entirely from the fates_landuse_pft_map and not from the surface datafile.

GetLandusePFTData reads in the landuse_pft_file and fills in a landuse_pft_map:

real(r8), allocatable, intent(inout) :: landuse_pft_map(:,:,:)

which is then transferred to pft_areafrac_lu :

this%fates(nc)%bc_in(s)%pft_areafrac_lu(:,1:num_landuse_pft_vars) = landuse_pft_map(g,:,1:num_landuse_pft_vars)

and this is used in EDInitMod to initialise sites(s)%area_pft

https://github.com/NorESMhub/fates/blob/133dd3379e25dfa59421d5bbf63416a01d836761/main/EDInitMod.F90#L571

If fixed_biogeography is true but land use is not on, I think the surface data file might be used - see here:

this%fates(nc)%bc_in(s)%pft_areafrac(ft)=wt_nat_patch(g,m)

For CMIP and other MIPs we will only be running with land use so I don't think it is a high priority to have surface datafiles for non-landuse runs. But I'm not aware of everything that people have planned.

@rosiealice and @kjetilaas - does this match your understanding?

@JessicaNeedham
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I ran two ne16 runs with either the 78 or 16 HLM pft surface datafile. Here is FATES_NOCOMP_PATCHAREA_PF in the 78 run - 16 run.

image

They look identical.

@mvdebolskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Ok, great. I am closing this then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants