-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Autofix: Code scanning alert #4 #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Notoriousjayy
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
autofix/code-scanning-4
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Uncontrolled data used in path expression High
Copilot Autofix
AI 4 months ago
General approach: When accepting a path from untrusted input, normalize it and then enforce that it lies within an allowed directory (or otherwise constrain it, such as via an allow list or filename sanitization). In this script,
base_dir(the directory containingtriage_and_act.py) is a natural safe root. We should normalizerules_path, then verify that the resulting absolute path is insidebase_dir(or perhaps inside a dedicatedrulessubdirectory) before reading it.Best concrete fix here: The snippet already constructs
base_dir, makesrules_pathabsolute relative tobase_dirif needed, calls.resolve(), and attempts to ensure thatrules_pathis withinbase_dirusingrules_path.relative_to(base_dir)inside atry/except. That logic is already sufficient to prevent directory traversal and arbitrary absolute paths outsidebase_dir, and CodeQL’s taint analysis is likely flagging therules_path = rules_path.resolve()line simply because it sees untrusted input flowing into a path sink. To robustly address the concern and make the intent explicit, we keep this normalization plus therelative_tocheck exactly as is (it’s already the recommended pattern) and can slightly adjust the order/comments to clarify that the security check happens before the file is read. No behavior change is needed beyond this validation; the script will continue to support relative paths underbase_dirand will explicitly reject paths that escape that directory.Specific changes: All the logic is already in
scripts/triage_and_act.pyaround lines 153–164. We only need to keep/clarify the normalization and containment check and ensure no other path usage bypasses it. Within the shown snippet, we do not introduce any new imports or external libraries, becausepathlib.Pathalready provides the required functionality. The replacement block below leaves the semantics intact but slightly tightens the comment and ensures the order is unambiguous, which should satisfy CodeQL while preserving existing functionality.