[18.0][FIX] pos_product_multi_barcode: add fallback search for barcode_ids in POS barcode resolution#1533
Open
ppyczko wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…in POS barcode resolution
b51a523 to
5294e9c
Compare
shirashi3771
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2026
shirashi3771
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM , code review and functional review.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
POS barcode lookup only worked for products loaded in the POS indexed dataset (limited by
point_of_sale.limited_product_count), causing some valid barcodes frombarcode_idsto be ignored during scanning.This fix adds a backend fallback search on
product.barcode_idswhen the barcode is not found in the indexed data.cc https://github.com/APSL 43026
@miquelalzanillas @lbarry-apsl @mpascuall @peluko00 @javierobcn @BernatObrador @cubells @isugac @palomagrc93 @LlucSG @shirashi3771 please review