Skip to content

[Regression Test] cube for PMB and single material#289

Draft
JBludau wants to merge 3 commits intoORNL:mainfrom
JBludau:basic_cube_regression
Draft

[Regression Test] cube for PMB and single material#289
JBludau wants to merge 3 commits intoORNL:mainfrom
JBludau:basic_cube_regression

Conversation

@JBludau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@JBludau JBludau commented Feb 13, 2026

Initial version of a 1mm cube for regression testing

TODOs

  • Have a functor for comparing the stresses
  • Probably also have a functor for comparing the Poisson ratio
  • Both will probably need something to either average (Verlet integration) or ADR integration

@JBludau JBludau marked this pull request as draft February 13, 2026 21:27
@JBludau JBludau self-assigned this Feb 13, 2026
@JBludau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

JBludau commented Feb 27, 2026

I added a functor that tries to evaluate the displacement error.
The problem seems to be that the particles are wiggling back and forth without the ADR damping and thus comparing displacements of individual particles is not easy. Averaging over the center region of the cube did not help.
image

@pabloseleson @streeve any thoughts? I don't know if there is a good fix for this except using the ADR damping...

@JBludau
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

JBludau commented Apr 13, 2026

As per discussion of the last meeting with @pabloseleson and @streeve, this we now prescribe a displacement on all particles that are less than the horizon away from any of the faces of the cube. This should eliminate surface effects.

Nevertheless, I need to allow approximately 10% error on the displacement to have this case pass.
Same holds for the contraction due to the Poisson ratio of 0.25

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant