Skip to content

fix(pr-review): use UV_PYTHON instead of UV_PYTHON_PREFERENCE #203

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
xingyaoww merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2026
Merged

fix(pr-review): use UV_PYTHON instead of UV_PYTHON_PREFERENCE #203

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion plugins/pr-review/action.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -149,7 +149,10 @@ runs:
- name: Run PR review
shell: bash
env:
UV_PYTHON_PREFERENCE: only-system
# Pin uv to the exact Python installed by setup-python so it
# ignores any .python-version in the PR repo checkout (which
# could be older *or* newer than 3.12).
UV_PYTHON: '3.12'
LLM_MODEL: ${{ steps.select-model.outputs.selected_model }}
LLM_BASE_URL: ${{ inputs.llm-base-url }}
REVIEW_STYLE: ${{ inputs.review-style }}
Expand Down
Loading