forked from dashpay/dash
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix: address review feedback for CoinJoin promotion/demotion (PR #7052) #44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
PastaPastaPasta
merged 6 commits into
PastaPastaPasta:feat/coinjoin-promotion
from
thepastaclaw:fix/7052-review-feedback
Mar 17, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9c02367
fix: add IsLockedCoin/IsSpent check in SelectFullyMixedForPromotion
thepastaclaw 1ead9a5
fix: add bounds checking for outpoint.n in coinjoin client
thepastaclaw 2578855
fix: acquire cs_main for V24 activation checks in server
thepastaclaw 3af9ac2
fix: enforce standard mixer minimum on full-session finalization
thepastaclaw d9428e1
refactor: use ValidatePromotionEntry/ValidateDemotionEntry in IsValid…
thepastaclaw cc50997
refactor: rename m_vecPromotionInputs to m_vecRebalanceInputs
thepastaclaw File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This path now sets
nExpectedInputDenomfromGetLargerAdjacentDenom(nSessionDenom)without checking for0, so a demotion-shaped entry (1input,10outputs) in a session already at the largest denom can pass structure/output validation and then accept a non-denominated input (AmountToDenomination == 0) if values balance. Before this commit, the explicitnLargerAdjacentDenom == 0guard rejected this case, so this is a regression that allows an invalid demotion mode and weakens the mixing rules for largest-denom sessions.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.