Skip to content

Pikepdf update to version 10.5.1#389

Closed
brobr wants to merge 3 commits intoPonce:pikepdffrom
brobr:pikepdf
Closed

Pikepdf update to version 10.5.1#389
brobr wants to merge 3 commits intoPonce:pikepdffrom
brobr:pikepdf

Conversation

@brobr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brobr brobr commented Mar 25, 2026

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

reverse dependencies - python/pikepdf

  • office/ocrmypdf
  • office/pdfarranger

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ sbolint - python/pikepdf ✅

pikepdf: NOTE: pikepdf.SlackBuild:60: SLKCFLAGS gets set, but never used.
pikepdf: NOTE: pikepdf.SlackBuild:61: LIBDIRSUFFIX gets set, but never used.
sbolint: pikepdf checks out OK

@Ponce
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ponce commented Mar 26, 2026

hi @brobr , does the ocrmypdf version we have in this repository works with this version of pikepdf?

@brobr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

brobr commented Mar 26, 2026

Hi Matteo, on
https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/blob/main/pyproject.toml
https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/blob/v16.13.0/pyproject.toml
it says:

"pikepdf>=10"  

But I do not maintain ocrmypdf.

Pdfarranger-1.13.0 works fine with this latest(?) pikepdf; I just
proposed the pikepdf upgrade to coincide with that of pdfarranger
to version 1.13.0 on current only. The current pikepdf on current is ok as well.

@Ponce Ponce deleted the branch Ponce:pikepdf March 29, 2026 12:07
@Ponce Ponce closed this Mar 29, 2026
@Ponce
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ponce commented Mar 29, 2026

Hi Matteo, on https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/blob/main/pyproject.toml https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/blob/v16.13.0/pyproject.toml it says:

"pikepdf>=10"  

But I do not maintain ocrmypdf.

yes, but if you update something you should check if what depends on it still works (this applies to stable and to this unofficial repository too)...

anyway, I pushed this, thanks for the commit!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants