Destructive Semantic Encoding — A New Paradigm for Information Security
What if security relied not on ever-more-complex mathematical locks, but on destroying the message itself in semantic noise that can't be reconstructed?
- Novel Paradigm: Destructive Semantic Encoding (DSE)
- 7 Progressive Levels: Vowel removal → Alphabet mutation
- Level-7 Innovation: Unique random alphabet key per compression
- Complexity: ~10^60 states (22 words), 10^35 years brute-force @ exascale
- Information Loss: 79.4% per word (true destruction, non-reversible)
- Validation: 40K+ French phrases tested
Unlike RSA/AES (reversible), LISP-7 intentionally destroys information:
Plain: "La technologie moderne"
L7 #1: "qpm nmx mme dmp vpm J" (key: abcd...xyz)
L7 #2: "tua vam aaj wau gua B" (key: wxyz...abc)
L7 #3: "nsl mlw llt cls dsl Z" (key: qrst...mno)
Same plaintext → completely different outputs every time
Without dictionary + alphabet key: Impossible to reconstruct.
Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17638778
@misc{charlet_2025_lisp7,
author = {Charlet, Théo},
title = {LISP-7: Linguistic Irreversible Scrambling Protocol
— Destructive Semantic Encoding (DSE)},
year = 2025,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.17638778},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17638778}
}| Level | Operation | Security |
|---|---|---|
| 1️⃣ | Vowel removal | Low |
| 2️⃣ | Extended removal | Low |
| 3️⃣ | Triadic extraction | Medium |
| 4️⃣ | Chaos markers | High |
| 5️⃣ | Letter permutation | Very High |
| 6️⃣ | Word-order scrambling | Extreme |
| 7️⃣ | Alphabet mutation | Maximum |
Two-Key Lock:
✅ Correct compressed + Correct key → Decompression works
❌ Correct compressed + Wrong key → FAIL
❌ Wrong compressed + Correct key → FAIL
❌ No dictionary → Impossible
State Space (Real Case: 22-word phrase)
- Level 7: ~7.67 × 10^60 configurations
Brute-Force @ Exascale (10^18 ops/sec)
- Level 7: 2.43 × 10^35 years (10^25 × age of universe)
- 🗃️ Archival security with semantic destruction
- 🔒 Privacy through irreversibility (not encryption)
- 🛡️ Multi-layer defense (DSE + AES-256)
- 📄 AI-resistant obfuscation
- Dictionary loss = irreversible
- Domain-specific effectiveness
- Metadata leakage (word lengths)
- Short words (< 3 chars) need handling
INPUT: "La technologie moderne revolutionne notre societe"
Level 3: Extract 1st + mid + last per word
Level 5: Randomize letter order per word
Level 6: Scramble word positions
Level 7: Apply unique alphabet substitution (K_α)
OUTPUT: "sgd adr ddy idg lgd H" (key: jpkmduqvanchylifbsrgowextz)
Decompression: Dictionary lookup + key reversal = 100% accurate
Visit the web interface and try the example already in the database:
- Compressed text
- Level 7 alphabet key
- Decompress it to see the original message
This demonstrates the two-key lock: without BOTH the compressed text AND the alphabet key, reconstruction is impossible.
The future of security: ever-more complex mathematical locks… or making the message disappear into semantic noise that can't be reconstructed?
LISP-7 answers: Destroy, don't hide. 🔐
Author: Théo Charlet (RDTvlokip) License: CC BY-SA 4.0