Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added a first model for NSL without any events/invariants/properties/proofs. This is meant as exercise after the model of the Online? protocol is done and before talking about properties.
Building on that first model, there is the extended version with the properties and proofs. The structure is: one event per protocol step (per state) and the state predicates only forward to the event predicates. This is the same as in core DY*. However, here we are using state lookup and the other simplified functions especially for de-/encryption and we don't split the total and stateful parts.
This version replaces the previous nsl model which is now removed.