Add Aaron's 'modern' ms56xx driver that never got upstreamed

[cowsed]

Description

We now have ms5611s on SPI and rather than copy aarons homework in the FSW ms5611 driver it seemed easier to copy aarons homework in the ms56xx driver

Changes from PR:

• lunch prefix for compatibles so (ie: launch,ms5611) to avoid conflicts with upstream driver
• no more chip-id, thats all decided based on which compatible is used

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Hasn't yet, all my hardware is on campus

Test Configuration:

Checklist:

• New functionality is documented in the necessary spots (i.e new functions documented in the header)
• Unit tests cover any new functionality or edge cases that the PR was meant to resolve (if applicable)
• The CI checks are passing
• I reviewed my own code in the GitHub diff and am sure that each change is intentional
• I feel comfortable about this code flying in a rocket

[AarC10]

Whoever wrote this driver is a shitty programmer. Also could replace meas with launch instead of renaming it to lms5611

[cowsed]

I can't believe launch silicon happened so quickly

[AarC10]

Man whoever wrote this is a really bad coder. Would never want them on my team thats for sure!