Skip to content

docs(sable-9si): PR comment sweep audit — B6 finding is misframed #115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Rome-1 merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2026
Merged

docs(sable-9si): PR comment sweep audit — B6 finding is misframed #115

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions docs/audits/pr-comment-sweep-2026-05-17.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# PR Comment Sweep — 2026-05-17 (sable-9si / maylist B6)

**Bead:** sable-9si
**Source ask:** maylist B6 — "Rome added comments to many other Rafter CLI PRs. Get agents on them."

## Method

1. Pulled every issue comment via `gh api repos/Raftersecurity/rafter-cli/issues/comments --paginate` (n=12).
2. Pulled every PR review comment via `gh api repos/Raftersecurity/rafter-cli/pulls/comments --paginate` (n=0).
3. Pulled every PR review via `gh pr list --json reviews` across 98 PRs (33 reviews, all from `Raftersecurity` org-bot).
4. Surveyed every open PR's body, mergeable state, and merge-state-status.

## Findings

### 1. No human Rome-the-user comments exist in the GitHub state

- The 11 issue comments with `user.login` of `Rome-1` / `rome-1` are all **status reports from agents acting under that identity** (PRs #9, #15, #22, #38, #39, #63, #66, #67, #69, #75, #95). They describe what was done; none contain unaddressed asks.
- Review comments: 0 across all 98 PRs.
- Reviews: 33 total, all from the `Raftersecurity` org account (CI bot decisions).

**Conclusion:** the dispatcher's "Rome added comments to many other Rafter CLI PRs" almost certainly refers to the maylist itself (the 29 A-items + 12 B-items dispatched in hq-wisp-7zh on 2026-05-11), **not** GitHub-resident comments. Those asks are already beaded as A1–A29 / B1–B12 and being worked through. No new GitHub-sourced asks exist to triage.

### 2. Open PR state (n=5)

| PR | Status | Disposition |
|----|--------|-------------|
| #95 promo/video-production (rf-zg8z) | Clean, mergeable | Separate work stream (promo), not in maylist scope |
| #83 promo/60s-storyboard (se-p3r) | Mergeable=UNKNOWN | Separate work stream (promo), not in maylist scope |
| #82 prompt-injection detector (DRAFT) | Clean, DRAFT — DO NOT MERGE | In-flight, tracked by sable-h6r (A4) |
| #75 confidence/remediation/fingerprint (rc-23v) | **CONFLICTING** | Already tracked: sable-xli is the blocked-on-redo bead |
| #60 prompt-injection (older, DRAFT) | Clean, DRAFT — DO NOT MERGE | Superseded by #82; tracked under sable-h6r (A4) |

### 3. No follow-up beads required

Every actionable item I found is already beaded. The single non-trivial finding (PR #75 has merge conflicts) is already covered by sable-xli, which is blocked on backend coordination (juno/orin) per its own description.

## What B6 actually asked for vs. what exists

The bead acceptance criteria said:
> Filter to comments from Rome that look like asks/fixes (not just emoji/approvals).
> For each ask: check if there's an existing bead or follow-up PR that resolves it. If no: file a new bead with discovered-from:THIS_BEAD_ID and tag with the PR number.

Result: **zero such comments found in the GitHub state.** The maylist itself is the comment list; it's already beaded.

## Recommendation

Close sable-9si. If a different sweep is intended (e.g., scanning Rome's mail/nudges/Slack for asks that didn't make it into the maylist), that's a different ask and should be a new bead with the actual source named.