net, virt: RHCOS9 and RHCOS10 Worker Nodes Support#65
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new Software Test Plan document was added for OpenShift Virtualization network testing on heterogeneous RHCOS 9/10 clusters, specifying QE metadata, P0/P1 goals for bidirectional VM live migration across multiple network configurations, scope boundaries, required environments, CI lane expectations, risks, and traceable CNV-77027 scenarios. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Report bugs in Issues Welcome! 🎉This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features: 🔄 Automatic Actions
📋 Available CommandsPR Status Management
Review & Approval
Testing & Validation
Cherry-pick Operations
Label Management
✅ Merge RequirementsThis PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:
📊 Review ProcessApprovers and ReviewersApprovers:
Reviewers:
Available Labels
AI Features
💡 Tips
For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md`:
- Line 123: Update the inconsistent "Cluster Topology: Agnostic" label to
reflect the actual required topologies used by the plan: replace the "Cluster
Topology: Agnostic" occurrences (including the instances around the lines
referencing 68-69, 88-90, and 123) with explicit wording such as "Cluster
Topology: Mixed RHCOS9 + RHCOS10, and All-RHCOS10" (or two separate entries) so
the document matches the stated test requirements; search for the exact string
"Cluster Topology:" in the file and change the value accordingly wherever it
currently reads "Agnostic".
- Line 194: The mitigation sentence "- **Mitigation:** Proceed with the
network-scoped STP independently; sync the main STP is available to identify and
resolve any overlaps or gaps." is grammatically broken; update the line (the
mitigation string) to read clearly, e.g. "Proceed with the network-scoped STP
independently; synchronize with the main STP when it becomes available to
identify and resolve any overlaps or gaps." Replace the existing mitigation
sentence in the document (the line starting with "- **Mitigation:** Proceed with
the network-scoped STP independently;") with this corrected phrasing.
- Line 7: The "Enhancement(s): -" metadata entry should be replaced with a
concrete reference to the related HLD or enhancement PR; edit the
"Enhancement(s)" field in stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md
(the line containing **Enhancement(s):**) and change "-" to a markdown link to
the HLD or enhancement PR (or the HLD if no PR exists) so the STP metadata is
traceable and auditable.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 6675e2f8-988e-48f0-b314-79b2acdde433
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md
azhivovk
force-pushed
the
rhel9_rhel10_nodes_arch
branch
from
122e6bf to
92a8885
Compare
|
Change: Apply bot's suggestions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md (1)
173-181: Normalize terminology formatting for consistency.The document mixes
Tier2/Tier 2andRHCOS10/RHCOS 10. Please standardize these terms to avoid ambiguity in test planning docs.Suggested wording cleanup
- - [x] **Risk:** Not testing Tier2 network tests on heterogeneous cluster. + - [x] **Risk:** Not testing Tier 2 network tests on heterogeneous cluster. ... - - *Missing resources or infrastructure:* No RHCOS10 clusters available for network Tier2 regression. + - *Missing resources or infrastructure:* No RHCOS 10 clusters available for network Tier 2 regression.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md` around lines 173 - 181, Standardize terminology formatting across the document by replacing inconsistent instances of "Tier2" with "Tier 2" and "RHCOS10" with "RHCOS 10" (e.g., within the "Risk" and "Test Environment" sections and checklist items) so all references use the spaced form; update every occurrence of these tokens (including checklist lines like "Not testing Tier2 network tests" and "Dedicated all-RHCOS 10 cluster" wording) to the chosen normalized forms for consistency.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md`:
- Around line 173-181: Standardize terminology formatting across the document by
replacing inconsistent instances of "Tier2" with "Tier 2" and "RHCOS10" with
"RHCOS 10" (e.g., within the "Risk" and "Test Environment" sections and
checklist items) so all references use the spaced form; update every occurrence
of these tokens (including checklist lines like "Not testing Tier2 network
tests" and "Dedicated all-RHCOS 10 cluster" wording) to the chosen normalized
forms for consistency.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 04eac364-7067-415b-b792-ee8b4cc7728a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
stps/sig-network/rhcos9-rhcos10-nodes-net-support.md
EdDev
left a comment
EdDev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A new revised rules have been merged recently. I suggest you rebase and post an updated content based on it. Coderabbit should kick in as well (but you can push it in a god share already with local treatment in advance).
azhivovk
force-pushed
the
rhel9_rhel10_nodes_arch
branch
from
92a8885 to
833f2d3
Compare
|
SiboWang1997 can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
jerry7z can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
jerry7z can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
SiboWang1997 can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
1 similar comment
|
SiboWang1997 can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
jerry7z can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
Network STP aspect for virt's feature Signed-off-by: Asia Khromov <azhivovk@redhat.com>
|
SiboWang1997 can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
jerry7z can not be added as reviewer. Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.: 422 {"message": "Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests-design-docs repository.", "documentation_url": "https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request", "status": "422"} |
|
|
/approve |
|
/approve cancel |
|
/approve |
|
/check-can-merge |
|
/sig-network |
12 participants
Network STP aspect for virt's feature
STP Metadata
VEP issue: -
What this PR does
Network STP aspect for virt's feature for planning the necessary network tests for the feature
Special notes for your reviewer
Parent virt STP
#92
Summary by CodeRabbit