cleanup Workflow/ folder#29
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| whether the issue is a regression in 26.2 or not. | ||
|
|
||
| - If the issue **is present** in 3.x, then you'll need to check whether the issue | ||
| occurs in older 3.x versions as well. | ||
| - If the issue is **not present** in 3.x, then you can try older 4.0 alphas and | ||
| - If the issue **is present** in 26.x, then you'll need to check whether the issue | ||
| occurs in older 26.x versions as well. | ||
| - If the issue is **not present** in 26.x, then you can try older 26.2 alphas and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably shouldnt reference 26.2 because that will get very dated very fast. I'd prolly keep it as 26.x
| To get the Redot source code for compiling, see [doc_getting_source](getting_source.md). | ||
|
|
||
| For a general overview of SCons usage for Redot, see [doc_introduction_to_the_buildsystem](introduction_to_the_buildsystem.md). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .md file extension needs to be removed from these, and they need to be prefixed with doc_
| <!-- TODO(Tekk): class_reference.md doesnt exist --> | ||
| <!-- TODO(Tekk): does this need to be re-written for current site? --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The class reference will work a bit differently.
These docs can typically be referenced with the class_ prefix for now, but won't actually do anything till we have the ClassDB implemented.
The idea, is that the site will pull the latest xml files from the engine repo for each versioned branch every 24 hours, and then use those to generate the class reference pages instead of using scripts to convert them to RST or Markdown like previous iterations did.
I think in the case of doc_class_reference I believe it was dynamically generated and updated by the previously mentioned conversion scripts.
| - Open the pull request page. Click the *fork*'s branch name near the top of the page: | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
|  |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Image links should be prefixed with a forward slash, so this should be:
|  | |
|  |
2 participants
changed non existing links, fixed image paths, made note blocks more consistent.