Skip to content

Harden SciMLTesting strict QA defaults - #43

Merged
ChrisRackauckas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent/monorepo-docs-discovery
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

Harden SciMLTesting strict QA defaults#43
ChrisRackauckas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent/monorepo-docs-discovery

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • retain SciMLTesting dependencies for Aqua subprocess checks
  • make the persistent-task allowance explicit while preserving caller overrides
  • discover the canonical manual for monorepo public API documentation without repository-specific QA paths
  • recognize owner-provided docstrings for imported public API

Verification

  • julia --project=. -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.test()' (363/363)\n- Runic --check --docstrings src/SciMLTesting.jl test/runtests.jl\n- OrdinaryDiffEqNonlinearSolve QA using this local SciMLTesting v2.6.3 worktree: JET 13 pass / 33 tracked broken, Aqua 30/30\n\nThis PR should be ignored until reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.

ChrisRackauckas and others added 2 commits August 10, 2026 22:45
Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
* Recognize Julia broadcast extension hooks in strict QA

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>

* Resolve Aqua ambiguity subprocess environments

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>

* Test QA project restoration for Aqua subprocesses

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: ChrisRackauckas-Claude <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
@ChrisRackauckas-Claude
ChrisRackauckas-Claude force-pushed the agent/monorepo-docs-discovery branch from 213dfb2 to a7f8d54 Compare August 11, 2026 02:53
@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2026 03:13
@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas merged commit 5c29144 into main Aug 11, 2026
12 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas
ChrisRackauckas deleted the agent/monorepo-docs-discovery branch August 11, 2026 03:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants