Draft
Conversation
These are the versions that are installed by pip without any "==x.y.z" in the requirement.txt with python 3.12.3 (ubuntu 24.04).
note: I have absolutely no knowledge of chinese or any non ideogram languages. I added space so the `` is correctly detected and the warning is gone. Perhaps a better handling when a ` (` special ( character would give a better look.
mrcmry
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a try to update the version of python packages.
I updated the packages to work on 3.12.3, the version of ubuntu 24.04. But I seems to fail in the CI.
I tried to run
make -e SPHINXOPTS="-D language='zh_CN'" htmland it worked on my machine.I fixed some chinese warnings due to `` not being detected due to missing spaces. Note that I have not knowledge of Chinese or any ideogram languages. But it's probably better like this that without. Perhaps the space before the special parenthesis used could be improved. At least it fix most of the warnings. I left one because it seems to be a multi line problem and I don't want to mess with the meaning.
Now the CI is failing so I will turn this into draft and fix this when I have time.