Skip to content

A ModuleDependency extension for excluding JetBrains Annotations - #737

Merged
alexander-yevsyukov merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
exclude-jetbrains-annotations
Aug 3, 2026
Merged

A ModuleDependency extension for excluding JetBrains Annotations#737
alexander-yevsyukov merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
exclude-jetbrains-annotations

Conversation

@alexander-yevsyukov

@alexander-yevsyukov alexander-yevsyukov commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds the ModuleDependency.excludeJetBrainsAnnotations() extension which allows to exclude JetBrains annotation from the dependencies of a published artifact. This is needed to avoid the version conflict in the consumer projects.

Other notable changes

  • Local dependencies were updated to the latest published versions.
  • The ModelCompiler dependency object was removed as no longer used.

@alexander-yevsyukov alexander-yevsyukov self-assigned this Aug 3, 2026
@alexander-yevsyukov alexander-yevsyukov moved this to 🏗 In progress in v2.0 Aug 3, 2026
@alexander-yevsyukov alexander-yevsyukov moved this from 🏗 In progress to In Review in v2.0 Aug 3, 2026

@armiol armiol left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alexander-yevsyukov assuming the PR is "ready for review", LGTM.

@alexander-yevsyukov
alexander-yevsyukov marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2026 16:09
@alexander-yevsyukov
alexander-yevsyukov merged commit c93dbee into master Aug 3, 2026
3 checks passed
@alexander-yevsyukov
alexander-yevsyukov deleted the exclude-jetbrains-annotations branch August 3, 2026 16:09
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In Review to ✅ Done in v2.0 Aug 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants