STAC-25374 VEX Jetty digest-authentication false positive - #27
Merged
Conversation
craffit
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2026
craffit
enabled auto-merge
July 23, 2026 07:38
craffit
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
not_affectedstatement forCVE-2026-10050/GHSA-2fvj-hgj9-j2grpkg:maven/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-security@9.4.60.sts1across the HBase-derived StackGraph images, including branch*-testimage namesrancher/image-scanningWhy this is not affected
Trivy maps the advisory to
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security:9.4.60.sts1from the Maven metadata embedded in the HBase shaded Jetty JAR. The upstream advisory, however, identifies the vulnerable implementation asorg.eclipse.jetty.client.util.DigestAuthentication.apply()in the separatejetty-clientmodule.hbase-thirdparty/hbase-shaded-jettyassembles an explicit set of Jetty server modules and does not depend onjetty-client. This statement is package-scoped because the vulnerable client implementation is absent from the reportedjetty-securityMaven component itself; the conclusion does not depend on an individual image name or registry.Packaged-artifact evidence
Inspected the current public image
quay.io/stackstate/hbase-master:2.5-8.1.11:sha256:71e711f7559fd03ecbb78f06f6b43c929a1391548bb203210c9312c20d625afahbase-server.tar:sha256:5834bba67881038485521a04dfe24feb3513f64b51015d473a1c19aeec6d79a5hbase-shaded-jetty-4.1.14.sts.20260717.b8d71bd.jarDigestAuthenticationentries: 0This proves the scanner can see the reported security package metadata while the vulnerable client code is absent.
Validation
python3 tools/build_index.py --checkjq empty pkg/maven/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-security/scan.openvex.json index.jsonCVE-2026-10050findingCVE-2026-10050findingsFollow-up
After internal review and merge, migrate the same evidence through a
rancher/image-scanningissue and track the generatedimage-scanningandrancher/vexhubPRs to completion. The migration remains required, but it does not block StackGraph PR #44.Tickets