chore: Split Registry

[Stranger6667]

No description provided.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 12.71%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 52 untouched benchmarks
🆕 20 new benchmarks
⏩ 10 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	build[CITM]	362.4 µs	318.9 µs	+13.65%
⚡	build[FHIR]	177.8 ms	142.6 ms	+24.7%
⚡	build[GeoJSON]	1,063.2 µs	887.8 µs	+19.76%
⚡	build[Open API]	5 ms	4.5 ms	+10.82%
⚡	build[Swagger]	5.7 ms	5.1 ms	+10.63%
🆕	prepare_owned[draft 7]	N/A	37.1 µs	N/A
❌	resolve[small]	2.6 µs	3 µs	-12.71%
🆕	prepare_borrowed[draft 4]	N/A	31.5 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_owned_with_specifications[Fast]	N/A	39.9 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_owned_with_specifications[CITM]	N/A	54.3 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_owned_with_specifications[GeoJSON]	N/A	79.9 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed[draft 2020-12]	N/A	33.9 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed[draft 7]	N/A	34.1 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed[draft 2019-09]	N/A	33.5 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed_with_specifications[Open API]	N/A	237.2 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed_with_specifications[GeoJSON]	N/A	75.7 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_owned[draft 2020-12]	N/A	37.1 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_owned_with_specifications[Open API]	N/A	249.7 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed_with_specifications[Swagger]	N/A	366.8 µs	N/A
🆕	prepare_borrowed_with_specifications[Fast]	N/A	37.7 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

---

_{Comparing registry-index-resolver-split (d3ff133) with master (241ece1)}

Footnotes

1. 10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.19009% with 167 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 94.20%. Comparing base (241ece1) to head (d3ff133).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rates/jsonschema-referencing/src/registry/build.rs	97.66%	38 Missing ⚠️
...tes/jsonschema-referencing/src/spec/draft202012.rs	83.62%	19 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema-referencing/src/spec/draft4.rs	86.59%	13 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema-referencing/src/spec/draft6.rs	83.33%	13 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema-referencing/src/registry/mod.rs	94.93%	12 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema-referencing/src/spec/draft7.rs	86.81%	12 Missing ⚠️
...tes/jsonschema-referencing/src/spec/draft201909.rs	88.17%	11 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema/src/compiler.rs	91.26%	11 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema-referencing/src/small_map.rs	93.46%	10 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema/src/options.rs	86.15%	9 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1070      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.50%   94.20%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files          81       87       +6     
  Lines       22610    23904    +1294     
==========================================
+ Hits        21367    22519    +1152     
- Misses       1243     1385     +142     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.