1009313: Resolved Operations not applied to user issue.#40
Merged
MohanaselvamJothi merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Feb 17, 2026
Merged
1009313: Resolved Operations not applied to user issue.#40MohanaselvamJothi merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
MohanaselvamJothi merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bug description
1009313: Resolved the Operations are not applied correctly to a newly joined user after the document is auto‑saved.
Root cause
In ImportFile API we are calling the GetPendingOperations using the FileName which returns 0 actions causing the issue.
Solution description
Need to use the roomName as we are using roomName to update actions to Redis cache.
Task and Ticket ID
Reason for not identifying earlier
Guidelines not followed. If yes, provide which guideline is not followed.
Guidelines not given. If yes, provide which/who need to address.
Tag label
update-guideline-coreteamorupdate-guideline-productteam.It was missed earlier
Areas tested against this fix
Provide details about the areas or combinations that have been tested against this code changes.
Is it a breaking issue?
breaking-issue.If yes, provide the breaking commit details / MR here.
Action taken
What action did you take to avoid this in future?
Feature matrix document updated
Automation details - Mark
Is Automatedfield as (Yes, Manual, Not Applicable) in corresponding JIRA task once the bug is automated.If the same issue is reproduced in ej2, what will you do?
Is this common issue need to be addressed in the same component or on other components in our platform?
needs-attention-coreteamOutput screenshots
Post the output screenshots if an UI is affected or added due to this bug.
Blazor Checklist
Confirm whether this feature is ensured in both Blazor Server and WASM
Is there any new API or existing API name change?
Is there any existing behavior change due to this code change?
breaking-changelabel.Do the code changes cause any memory leak and performance issue? (Test only if you suspect that your code may cause problem)
Reviewer Checklist