chore: Bump Pure.DI from 2.4.3 to 2.5.0

[dependabot]

Updated Pure.DI from 2.4.3 to 2.5.0.

Release notes

Sourced from Pure.DI's releases.

2.5.0

❗ Breaking Changes

• [Bind] Member Exports Renamed to [Export] — The attribute used to expose fields, properties, and methods as bindings is now ExportAttribute.
  • Replace member-level [Bind] usage with [Export].
  • BindAttribute now represents implementation-level bindings.
  • Related terminology was aligned from “exposed roots” to “exported roots”; use RootKinds.Exported instead of RootKinds.Exposed.

🚀 New Features

• Implementation-Level Binding Attributes — Pure.DI can now discover bindings declared directly on implementation types.

  • Use [Bind(typeof(IContract), Lifetime.Singleton, "tag")] to declare contract, lifetime, and tags on a class or struct.
  • Built-in Type, Tag, and new Lifetime attributes can now participate in implementation binding metadata.
  • Multiple contracts and tags in the same attribute group are merged into one binding.
  • Separate Bind attribute groups on the same implementation create separate bindings.
  • Generic marker contracts such as typeof(IBox<TT>) are supported for generic implementations.
  • See readme/bind-attribute.md.

• Custom Binding Attributes

  • Custom attributes can now be registered as implementation-level binding metadata.
  • TypeAttribute<T>(), TagAttribute<T>(), and the new LifetimeAttribute<T>() allow Pure.DI to read contract, tag, and lifetime metadata from custom attribute constructor arguments.
  • This enables implementation assemblies to describe their DI role while keeping composition setup concise.
  • See readme/custom-bind-attribute.md.

• Export Attribute for Member-Based Bindings

  • New ExportAttribute replaces member-level BindAttribute for fields, properties, and methods.
  • Supports exported members with explicit contract type, lifetime, and tags.
  • Generic exported members remain supported.
  • See readme/export-attribute.md.

🛠 Improvements

• Binding Metadata Validation

  • Added diagnostics for invalid implementation-level binding metadata.
  • Pure.DI now reports an error when an implementation type has multiple lifetime attributes inside the same binding group.

• Documentation and Usage Scenarios

  • Added new examples for bind type attributes, tag attributes, lifetime attributes, metadata merging, generic contracts, multiple contracts, custom bind attributes, and exported members.

Full Changelog: DevTeam/Pure.DI@2.4.3...2.5.0

Commits viewable in compare view.

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[github-actions]

Test Results

   18 files  ±0     18 suites  ±0   7m 31s ⏱️ +21s
1 038 tests ±0  1 037 ✅ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
5 160 runs  ±0  5 159 ✅ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit b350d3f. ± Comparison against base commit fe678a9.

[github-actions]

🚀 Benchmark Results

Details

BenchmarkDotNet v0.15.8, Linux Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)

AMD EPYC 9V74 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 4 logical and 2 physical cores

.NET SDK 10.0.301

[Host] : .NET 10.0.9 (10.0.9, 10.0.926.27113), X64 RyuJIT x86-64-v4
Job=InProcess  Toolchain=InProcessEmitToolchain  IterationCount=15

LaunchCount=1  WarmupCount=10

Resolve	Size	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio	Allocated	Alloc Ratio
baseline*	8	8.099 ns	0.0158 ns	0.0132 ns	1.25	-	NA
Awaiten	8	6.477 ns	0.1386 ns	0.1228 ns	1.00	-	NA
MsDI	8	6.730 ns	0.0146 ns	0.0130 ns	1.04	-	NA
Autofac	8	85.569 ns	1.8122 ns	1.6951 ns	13.22	656 B	NA
Jab	8	2.115 ns	0.1356 ns	0.1268 ns	0.33	-	NA
PureDI	8	4.506 ns	0.0091 ns	0.0085 ns	0.70	-	NA
DryIoc	8	6.227 ns	0.1344 ns	0.1192 ns	0.96	-	NA
SimpleInjector	8	8.993 ns	0.0881 ns	0.0736 ns	1.39	-	NA
baseline*	256	8.925 ns	0.0062 ns	0.0049 ns	1.38	-	NA
Awaiten	256	6.472 ns	0.1442 ns	0.1349 ns	1.00	-	NA
MsDI	256	6.433 ns	0.0158 ns	0.0147 ns	0.99	-	NA
Autofac	256	83.112 ns	0.5318 ns	0.4974 ns	12.85	656 B	NA
Jab	256	36.146 ns	0.0135 ns	0.0126 ns	5.59	-	NA
PureDI	256	6.677 ns	0.0058 ns	0.0054 ns	1.03	-	NA
DryIoc	256	6.219 ns	0.1431 ns	0.1339 ns	0.96	-	NA
SimpleInjector	256	8.759 ns	0.0205 ns	0.0160 ns	1.35	-	NA

Details

BenchmarkDotNet v0.15.8, Linux Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)

AMD EPYC 9V45 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 4 logical and 2 physical cores

.NET SDK 10.0.301

[Host] : .NET 10.0.9 (10.0.9, 10.0.926.27113), X64 RyuJIT x86-64-v4
Job=InProcess  Toolchain=InProcessEmitToolchain  IterationCount=15

LaunchCount=1  WarmupCount=10

Realistic	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio	Allocated	Alloc Ratio
baseline*	243.5 ns	2.71 ns	2.41 ns	1.68	568 B	1.00
Awaiten	145.06 ns	1.031 ns	0.965 ns	1.00	568 B	1.00
MsDI	360.31 ns	0.659 ns	0.550 ns	2.48	1104 B	1.94
Autofac	3,892.46 ns	11.714 ns	10.957 ns	26.83	13696 B	24.11
Jab	110.18 ns	0.110 ns	0.086 ns	0.76	432 B	0.76
DryIoc	226.73 ns	2.713 ns	2.538 ns	1.56	944 B	1.66
SimpleInjector	356.14 ns	1.557 ns	1.301 ns	2.46	1096 B	1.93
PureDI	96.46 ns	1.094 ns	1.024 ns	0.67	632 B	1.11

Details

BenchmarkDotNet v0.15.8, Linux Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)

AMD EPYC 9V74 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 4 logical and 2 physical cores

.NET SDK 10.0.301

[Host] : .NET 10.0.9 (10.0.9, 10.0.926.27113), X64 RyuJIT x86-64-v3
Job=InProcess  Toolchain=InProcessEmitToolchain  IterationCount=15

LaunchCount=1  WarmupCount=10

Build	Size	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio	Allocated	Alloc Ratio
baseline*	8	20.45 ns	0.967 ns	0.905 ns	1.16	144 B	1.00
Awaiten	8	17.559 ns	0.1193 ns	0.1116 ns	1.00	144 B	1.00
MsDI	8	1,495.134 ns	16.1757 ns	15.1308 ns	85.15	5688 B	39.50
Autofac	8	34,116.385 ns	261.7863 ns	244.8750 ns	1,943.08	33098 B	229.85
Jab	8	8.941 ns	0.1276 ns	0.1065 ns	0.51	96 B	0.67
PureDI	8	16.147 ns	0.3584 ns	0.3177 ns	0.92	128 B	0.89
DryIoc	8	746.638 ns	8.9165 ns	8.3405 ns	42.52	1528 B	10.61
SimpleInjector	8	11,614.318 ns	328.0099 ns	306.8207 ns	661.49	24760 B	171.94
baseline*	256	94.80 ns	3.493 ns	3.267 ns	1.18	2128 B	1.00
Awaiten	256	80.185 ns	0.2417 ns	0.2142 ns	1.00	2128 B	1.00
MsDI	256	14,205.415 ns	164.5927 ns	153.9601 ns	177.16	61016 B	28.67
Autofac	256	815,201.086 ns	3,404.0193 ns	3,017.5744 ns	10,166.56	738960 B	347.26
Jab	256	66.695 ns	0.6042 ns	0.5045 ns	0.83	2080 B	0.98
PureDI	256	74.591 ns	0.4796 ns	0.4251 ns	0.93	2112 B	0.99
DryIoc	256	45,886.538 ns	393.5775 ns	348.8962 ns	572.26	80645 B	37.90
SimpleInjector	256	349,230.242 ns	8,245.3826 ns	7,309.3169 ns	4,355.33	572978 B	269.26

baseline* rows show the corresponding Awaiten benchmark from the most recent successful main branch build with results, for regression comparison.