Skip to content

Add Codex PR structure guidelines#121

Merged
Tibo2403 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex-pr-structure-guidelines
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

Add Codex PR structure guidelines#121
Tibo2403 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex-pr-structure-guidelines

Conversation

@Tibo2403

@Tibo2403 Tibo2403 commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What Problem This Solves

Codex did not have an explicit repository-level instruction to structure PR descriptions, merge proposals, push summaries, or validation notes with the evidence-based format used in recent successful PRs.

Why This Change Was Made

This adds the reusable structure directly to AGENTS.md, so Codex can apply it consistently when preparing future changes in this repository.

User Impact

No runtime behavior changes. Future Codex-assisted pushes and PRs should be clearer, easier to review, and more evidence-based.

Evidence

  • Before: AGENTS.md only had general workspace doctor and validation guidance.
  • Tests: Documentation-only change; no runtime tests required.
  • Checks: Change is limited to AGENTS.md.
  • Autoreview: No blocking risk identified.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 5, 2026 22:16

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds repository-level guidance in AGENTS.md so future Codex-assisted PR descriptions, merge proposals, push summaries, and validation notes follow a consistent, evidence-based structure.

Changes:

  • Introduces a standardized template with sections for Problem, Rationale, User Impact, and Evidence.
  • Clarifies what “Evidence” should contain (before/after context, tests, checks, autoreview) and encourages concrete, verifiable details.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@Tibo2403 Tibo2403 merged commit 2625dd2 into main Jul 5, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants