Skip to content

Renamed CI gate job to the standard "Required checks pass" check#26

Merged
aileen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/required-checks-pass-gate
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

Renamed CI gate job to the standard "Required checks pass" check#26
aileen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/required-checks-pass-gate

Conversation

@aileen

@aileen aileen commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

Branch protection on this repo currently requires a status check named exactly All tests pass. Requiring individual or legacy check names couples branch protection to the CI matrix: rename a job (or change what the workflow contains) and the required check silently stops existing, blocking every PR.

The org is standardizing every repo on a single stable aggregator check named Required checks pass (per the repo-ci-required-check convention), so rulesets can require one identical context everywhere.

What

  • Renamed the aggregator job all-tests-pass -> required-checks-pass with name: Required checks pass. The if: always(), needs: [test] coverage, and the failure-detection step are unchanged.
  • Top-level permissions: contents: read was already present.

Note for reviewers

The branch ruleset is being updated in the same pass to require Required checks pass instead of All tests pass, so this PR must go green on the new gate before merge.

Branch protection previously required the check named "All tests pass",
which couples the ruleset to this repo's particular CI job naming. The
org is standardizing every repo on a single stable aggregator check
named "Required checks pass", so rulesets can require one identical
context everywhere regardless of how the underlying test matrix evolves.

The branch ruleset is being updated in the same pass to require the new
check name, so this change must go green on the new gate before merge.
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for this team, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 22 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8c270ca6-05b8-421b-9f24-4116fc9d1de1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae1febc and 782b846.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/required-checks-pass-gate

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@aileen aileen merged commit 3955230 into main Jul 6, 2026
6 checks passed
@aileen aileen deleted the ci/required-checks-pass-gate branch July 6, 2026 07:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant