Skip to content

Support for Live photos, windows tests, supplemental-metadata fixes - #17

Open
trmfreitas wants to merge 20 commits into
Wacheee:masterfrom
trmfreitas:master
Open

Support for Live photos, windows tests, supplemental-metadata fixes#17
trmfreitas wants to merge 20 commits into
Wacheee:masterfrom
trmfreitas:master

Conversation

@trmfreitas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • Better suffix removal by correctly evaluating situations where replica counter is included in image name like (img(1)).
  • Dependencies upgraded
  • Windows tests corrections
  • Added new test cases
  • Support by live photos by moving the .MP4 and applying the date from the .json for the corresponding image

trmfreitas added 12 commits May 5, 2025 20:09
refs [Wacheee#15](Wacheee#15)

recovered tests on windows and added test for rename json with supplemental metadata
refs [[Wacheee#15]

Fixed problem with files that only have the supplemental as .s.... by checking if the json format is already good and a corresponding file already exists

Cached directory list on jsonForFile for speeding up process
…counter

Fix supplemental metadata with counter
refs Wacheee#16

locates corresponding picture file json when searching for .MP4
refs [Wacheee#16]

support MP4 with HEIC files too
refs Wacheee#16

locates corresponding picture file json when searching for .MP4
refs [[[Wacheee#15](Wacheee#15)]

Fixed problem with files that only have the supplemental as .s.... by checking if the json format is already good and a corresponding file already exists

Cached directory list on jsonForFile for speeding up process
…counter

fix: add support for supplemental metadata json with counter
@trmfreitas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Fixes #15 and #16.

@Wacheee

Wacheee commented May 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hey, I was on vacation, so I just saw this. I noticed you added commits unrelated to this functionality (e.g., you removed macos-13, which is needed to build executables for both CPU architectures on macOS).

Could you open a PR with separate branches? That way it’ll be easier to debug.
Thanks for the PR!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants