Reject incompatible FTS and literal search modes - #4979
Merged
Conversation
# Conflicts: # src/CodeIndex/Cli/QueryCommandRunner.Search.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
--exact,--exact-substring, or--token-boundaryafter argument normalization and before search dispatch.E010_USAGE_ERRORresponses for human and JSON search output while preserving the audit invocation contract.Root cause
Exact-search aliases were normalized without a compatibility check against raw FTS. The token-boundary conflict used a separate late validation path, so incompatible semantic flags could reach query context together.
Validation
dotnet build CodeIndex.sln -c Release— passed with 0 warnings/errors.dotnet run --project tools/CodeIndex.Changelog -- check— validated 53 fragments.Related issues
Fixes #4879