Fix SECURITY.md: align version table with pyproject.toml and remove template placeholders

[Copilot]

SECURITY.md contained placeholder versions (4.0.x, 5.1.x) that didn't match the actual project version (0.1.0 in pyproject.toml), undermining credibility.

Changes

• Version table: Updated from placeholder versions to 0.1.x (matches pyproject.toml)
• Reporting instructions: Replaced template text with actionable email-based process including required information (description, steps to reproduce, impact)
• Response SLAs: Added concrete timelines (48-72h acknowledgment, 7-14d resolution)
• Project-specific guidance: Added security best practices for API token handling and .env usage
• Maturity context: Added note acknowledging early-stage status and potential API changes

All generic template language removed. Documentation now accurately represents project state.

Original prompt

---

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>[Code Quality] Fix SECURITY.md placeholder content with actual project versions</issue_title>
<issue_description>### Description

SECURITY.md currently contains placeholder version numbers (4.0.x, 5.1.x) that don't match the actual project version (0.1.0). This creates confusion and undermines the credibility of the security policy.

Suggested Changes

• Update version table to reflect actual project version (0.1.0)
• Add clear instructions for reporting security vulnerabilities
• Align security policy with project maturity level
• Remove generic placeholder content

Files Affected

• SECURITY.md (entire file)

Success Criteria

• Version numbers match pyproject.toml version (0.1.0)
• Security reporting instructions are clear and actionable
• Policy reflects actual project state (not enterprise template)
• All placeholder text removed

Source

Extracted from:

• Daily Backlog Burner Discussion abhimehro/ctrld-sync#221
• Daily QA Report Discussion abhimehro/ctrld-sync#220

Priority

High - Security documentation should be accurate to maintain project credibility

🔍 Task mining by Discussion Task Miner - Code Quality Improvement Agent

To install this workflow, run gh aw add github/gh-aw/.github/workflows/discussion-task-miner.md@94662b1dee8ce96c876ba9f33b3ab8be32de82a4. View source at https://github.com/github/gh-aw/tree/94662b1dee8ce96c876ba9f33b3ab8be32de82a4/.github/workflows/discussion-task-miner.md.

• expires on Feb 16, 2026, 5:31 AM UTC

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

Custom agent used: Development Partner
The Development Partner Protocol

• Fixes [Code Quality] Fix SECURITY.md placeholder content with actual project versions #233

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[trunk-io]

😎 Merged manually by @abhimehro - details.

[github-actions]

👋 Development Partner is reviewing this PR. Will provide feedback shortly.

[github-actions]

👋 Development Partner is reviewing this PR. Will provide feedback shortly.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR fixes SECURITY.md by removing placeholder template content and aligning it with the actual project version (0.1.0) from pyproject.toml. The changes transform SECURITY.md from a generic template with fictional version numbers (4.0.x, 5.1.x) into project-specific documentation that accurately reflects the early-stage nature of ctrld-sync.

Changes:

• Updated version table from placeholder versions (4.0.x, 5.1.x) to actual project version (0.1.x)
• Replaced generic template text with concrete vulnerability reporting process including email-based reporting, required information, and response SLAs
• Added project-specific security best practices for Control D API token handling and .env file usage

[github-actions]

👋 Development Partner is reviewing this PR. Will provide feedback shortly.