Skip to content

🔧 chore(deps): regenerate stale uv.lock (langchain-core constraint)#300

Merged
Chisanan232 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/uv-lock-drift
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

🔧 chore(deps): regenerate stale uv.lock (langchain-core constraint)#300
Chisanan232 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/uv-lock-drift

Conversation

@Chisanan232

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

uv.lock was out of sync with pyproject.toml's langchain-test group (langchain-core specifier <1.5.0 in the lock vs <1.6.0 in pyproject.toml, left behind by #296's constraint bump). This was failing every PR's CI with uv sync --locked erroring "lockfile needs to be updated" — including dependency-upgrade PRs that don't touch pyproject.toml/uv.lock at all (e.g. #297, actions/setup-uv).

Verified locally: unit (1131 passed) and integration (38 passed) suites both green with the regenerated lock.

uv.lock was out of sync with pyproject.toml's langchain-test group
(langchain-core specifier <1.5.0 in the lock vs <1.6.0 in
pyproject.toml, left behind by #296's constraint bump). This was
failing every PR's CI with `uv sync --locked` erroring "lockfile
needs to be updated" — including dependency-upgrade PRs that don't
touch pyproject.toml/uv.lock at all (e.g. #297, actions/setup-uv).

Verified: unit (1131 passed) and integration (38 passed) suites both
green with the regenerated lock.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Chisanan232
Chisanan232 merged commit 2f5716b into main Jul 23, 2026
26 checks passed
@Chisanan232
Chisanan232 deleted the fix/uv-lock-drift branch July 23, 2026 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant