chore: correct wording in memoizable notification message#326
Open
blai30 wants to merge 1 commit intoaidenybai:mainfrom
Open
chore: correct wording in memoizable notification message#326blai30 wants to merge 1 commit intoaidenybai:mainfrom
blai30 wants to merge 1 commit intoaidenybai:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@blai30 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Million Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
+1 for the spelling fix. However this PR is (accidentally, I assume) including an extra file due to a spelling mistake in the file name. I opened #353 which is essentially this PR minus the extra file. |
blai30
force-pushed
the
chore/explanation-wording
branch
from
de29597 to
387427d
Compare
|
The author has corrected this PR, I closed #353 in favour of this one. |
aggKartik
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Small correction to the wording:
would not oftowould not have