Performance optimizations and testing improvements#40
Open
leodutra wants to merge 8 commits into
Open
Conversation
- Replace negated ASCII range /[^\u0000-\u007e]/g with positive Unicode range /[\u0080-\uFFFF]/g - Pre-compile regex pattern to eliminate compilation overhead on each function call - Achieves 12.9% average performance improvement with up to 28.6% gains on ASCII-heavy strings - Maintains 100% backward compatibility and identical functionality - Particularly effective for strings with low accent density Performance improvements: - Numbers: +10.7% (14.6M → 16.2M ops/sec) - No accents: +13.1% (14.1M → 16.0M ops/sec) - ASCII-only: +28.6% (10.7M → 13.8M ops/sec) - Special chars: +11.6% (12.8M → 14.2M ops/sec)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces significant performance optimizations and testing capabilities for the diacritics removal library. The main optimization replaces a negated ASCII range regex with a positive Unicode range, resulting in 10-30% performance improvements across different test scenarios.
Key changes:
- Optimized regex pattern from negated ASCII range to positive Unicode range for better performance
- Added comprehensive benchmark script with detailed performance metrics and analysis
- Added coverage analysis script to check diacritics character coverage across Unicode ranges
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| package.json | Added benchmark npm script and files field for package distribution |
| index.js | Replaced regex pattern with optimized Unicode range for performance improvement |
| checkCoverage.js | Added script to analyze diacritics character coverage across Unicode ranges |
| benchmark.js | Added comprehensive performance testing suite with detailed metrics |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
…r improved character mapping
…ing benchmark functionality
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚀 Performance & Optimization Improvements for node-diacritics
Overview
This PR introduces significant performance improvements and optimizations to the
node-diacriticslibrary, achieving a 22.9% overall performance increase while adding comprehensive testing and maintaining 100% backward compatibility.Performance Results
Overall Performance Improvement: +22.9%
Key Improvements
1. Targeted Unicode Range Processing
\u0080-\uFFFF(65,408 code points)2. Optimized Function Architecture
RegExpconstructor for better pattern organization3. Comprehensive Testing & Benchmarking
4. Better Code Organization
🔧 Technical Changes
Core Optimization
Function Optimization
Enhanced Testing
New Test Coverage
Benchmark Suite
Package Enhancements
New Scripts
Files Added
benchmark.js- Comprehensive performance testing suiteanalyzeMapping.js- Character mapping coverage analysisCompatibility & Safety