Docs: add exmaple of how to read parquet row groups in parallel#9396
Open
alamb wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Open
Docs: add exmaple of how to read parquet row groups in parallel#9396alamb wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
alamb wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
It is possible to read a parquet file in parallel today using the arrow-rs APIs (making an individual reader to read individual parts), however, it is not always obvious how to do so as @pmarks observes on #9381
What changes are included in this PR?
Add additional documentation explaining how to read files in parallel, along with a doc example
Here is an example of what it looks like rendered:
Are these changes tested?
By CI
Are there any user-facing changes?
more docs; No functional changes