Skip to content

fix(security): 2 improvements across 2 files#1492

Open
tomaioo wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
tomaioo:fix/security/integer-overflow-in-negative-ack-backoff
Open

fix(security): 2 improvements across 2 files#1492
tomaioo wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
tomaioo:fix/security/integer-overflow-in-negative-ack-backoff

Conversation

@tomaioo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@tomaioo tomaioo commented May 10, 2026

Summary

fix(security): 2 improvements across 2 files

Problem

Severity: High | File: pulsar/negative_backoff_policy.go:L30

In pulsar/negative_backoff_policy.go, the backoff calculation uses bit shift (minNackTime << redeliveryCount) which can overflow when redeliveryCount is large. The overflow causes backoff to become 0, resulting in immediate retry without any delay, potentially causing a denial of service.

Solution

Add overflow check before the shift operation: if redeliveryCount >= 63 { return maxNackTime }. Also consider using math.Min with a pre-computed maximum to avoid the overflow entirely.

Changes

  • pulsar/negative_backoff_policy.go (modified)
  • oauth2/oidc_endpoint_provider.go (modified)

tomaioo added 2 commits May 10, 2026 11:22
- Security: Integer Overflow in Negative Ack Backoff Policy
- Security: Potential SSRF via Issuer URL in OIDC Endpoint Provider

Signed-off-by: tomaioo <203048277+tomaioo@users.noreply.github.com>
- Security: Integer Overflow in Negative Ack Backoff Policy
- Security: Potential SSRF via Issuer URL in OIDC Endpoint Provider

Signed-off-by: tomaioo <203048277+tomaioo@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@RobertIndie RobertIndie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a test to verify the change? And please refine the PR to reflect the change. It's better to split two issue fixes into 2 PRs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR aims to strengthen security in two areas of the Go Pulsar client: (1) making default negative-ack backoff safer under extreme redelivery counts, and (2) tightening validation of OIDC issuer URLs before fetching the .well-known configuration.

Changes:

  • Add a guard in the default nack backoff policy intended to prevent overflow in exponential backoff calculation.
  • Add issuer URL validation (HTTPS scheme + non-empty host) before fetching OIDC well-known endpoints.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
pulsar/negative_backoff_policy.go Adds a redelivery-count guard before performing a left-shift backoff calculation.
oauth2/oidc_endpoint_provider.go Adds issuer URL validation (scheme/host) before performing the HTTP GET to the well-known endpoint.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +44 to 49
if redeliveryCount >= 63 {
return maxNackTime
}

backoff := float64(minNackTime << redeliveryCount)
return time.Duration(math.Min(backoff, float64(maxNackTime)))
Comment on lines +44 to +46
// Validate URL scheme - only allow HTTPS to prevent SSRF attacks
if u.Scheme != "https" {
return nil, errors.New("issuer URL must use HTTPS scheme")
Comment on lines +44 to +50
// Validate URL scheme - only allow HTTPS to prevent SSRF attacks
if u.Scheme != "https" {
return nil, errors.New("issuer URL must use HTTPS scheme")
}

// Validate host is not empty
if u.Host == "" {
@RobertIndie RobertIndie modified the milestones: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 Jun 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants