Skip to content

feat: better debug options#399

Open
gibix wants to merge 2 commits intoarduino:mainfrom
gibix:feat/log
Open

feat: better debug options#399
gibix wants to merge 2 commits intoarduino:mainfrom
gibix:feat/log

Conversation

@gibix
Copy link
Member

@gibix gibix commented Mar 18, 2026

this is need to start the debug log and shell as soon as possible for coming ota support

Signed-off-by: Gilberto Conti <g.conti@arduino.cc>
@gibix gibix mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2026
11 tasks
@gibix gibix changed the title better debug options feat: better debug options Mar 18, 2026
Copy link

@pillo79 pillo79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM! @iabdalkader WDYT?

skip the check for invalid or debug sketch and only consider
CONFIG_SHELL

Signed-off-by: Gilberto Conti <g.conti@arduino.cc>
@github-actions
Copy link

Built 0.53.2-0.dev+873a5d04

CI run PASSED 🟢

ArtifactBoardCoreTestsRAMSketchesWarningsErrors
zephyr_contrib ek_ra8d1 📗

11.9%

2--
frdm_mcxn947 3 🏷️

58.0%

2--
frdm_rw612 2 🏷️

83.0%

2--
✔️* zephyr_main giga 4 🏷️ ✅*

54.5%

448-
nano33ble 1 🏷️ ✅*

78.7%

228-
nano_matter 📗 ✔️*

⚠️ 85.7%

208(2*)
niclasense 2 🏷️ ✅*

⚠️ 87.3%

208-
opta 4 🏷️ ✔️*

46.7%

548(2*)
portentac33 3 🏷️ ✔️*

⚠️ 95.1%

568(8*)
portentah7 3 🏷️ ✔️*

47.3%

588(2*)
✅* zephyr_unoq unoq 📗 ✅*

26.4%

608-
Legend

BoardTestStatus description
🔥 🔥 Test run failed to complete.
🔴 Test completed with unexpected errors.
✔️* 🚫 Test completed with errors, but all are known/expected.
✅* 🟡 Test completed with some warnings; no errors detected.
🟢 Test passed successfully, with no warnings or errors.
🌑 🌑 Test was skipped.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 18, 2026

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

# Enable runtime statistics
CONFIG_SYS_HEAP_RUNTIME_STATS=y
CONFIG_THREAD_RUNTIME_STATS=y

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

@iabdalkader
Copy link

Otherwise LGTM! @iabdalkader WDYT?

I've tested this with Portenta-H7, with/without debugging etc.. it seems fine, haven't noticed any issues.

@per1234 per1234 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants