STY: apply ruff formatting #1003
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mj-will
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
Collaborator
mj-will
left a comment
mj-will
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ColmTalbot do you want to get this in before or after the backend changes?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like copilot refused my request to work on this so here's a PR that closes #977.
This should not be squashed as I added a file to ignore the commit where everything changed when blaming (it mostly works, but gets a bit confused by blank lines).
I made some editorial choices in how we import things/define
__all__. We should probably clean up the namespace at some stage, but I refrained from doing that here and added explicitnoqatags when needed to support that.