Arch/qa env seeding tweaks

[MGibson1]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-34880
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-34881
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-34886

📔 Objective

Various tweaks to smooth qa automation testing.

📸 Screenshots

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 3582801a-f97b-4fef-b908-6e6a2030c1cf

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 19.04762% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.44%. Comparing base (4883d49) to head (c19faae).
⚠️ Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...lling/Services/Implementations/LicensingService.cs	20.00%	23 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...SharedWeb/Utilities/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7430      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.53%   58.44%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files        2069     2067       -2     
  Lines       91306    91016     -290     
  Branches     8128     8085      -43     
==========================================
- Hits        53443    53197     -246     
+ Misses      35954    35916      -38     
+ Partials     1909     1903       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[kdenney]

Logic looks good! Only thing I'd ask is if you could add some unit tests to cover the new changes? We've had issues in the past with changes to the licensing logic causing regressions so I like to make sure we cover that area pretty thoroughly. Thanks!

[justindbaur]

Suggested change

	IssuerSigningKey = issuerKey,
	IssuerSigningKeys =_verificationCertificates.Select((c) => new X509SecurityKey(c)),

This should also mean you don't need to do any merges since only one would be valid anyways. This just says both of those keys are valid.