Skip to content

Add comprehensive PVST test plan document#3

Open
devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
devin/1765584499-pvst-test-plan
Open

Add comprehensive PVST test plan document#3
devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
devin/1765584499-pvst-test-plan

Conversation

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description of PR

Summary:
This PR adds a comprehensive test plan document for validating Per-VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST) functionality in SONiC. The test plan covers PVST and Rapid PVST (RPVST) protocol implementations using the T0 topology configurations with two VLAN and four VLAN setups.

The document includes:

  • Overview of PVST protocol and variants (PVST/RPVST/MSTP)
  • Test environment documentation for two_vlan_a and four_vlan_a topologies from ansible/vars/topo_t0-isolated-d16u16s1.yml
  • 21 comprehensive test cases covering per-VLAN STP instance independence, interface-specific configuration, topology change resilience, protocol variant testing, and configuration persistence
  • API reference for functions in spytest/apis/switching/pvst.py
  • Validation criteria and pass/fail definitions

Reviewer focus areas:

  • Verify API function names/parameters match actual implementation in spytest/apis/switching/pvst.py
  • Verify VLAN topology configurations match ansible/vars/topo_t0-isolated-d16u16s1.yml
  • Check test case coverage is sufficient for PVST validation

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • 202511

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

To provide a structured test plan for validating PVST functionality in SONiC, enabling systematic testing of per-VLAN spanning tree instances using the existing SPyTest PVST API.

How did you do it?

Created a comprehensive markdown document that:

  1. Documents the test environment using existing T0 topology configurations
  2. Defines 21 test cases organized by functional area
  3. References the existing PVST API functions from spytest/apis/switching/pvst.py
  4. Establishes clear pass/fail validation criteria

How did you verify/test it?

This is a documentation-only change. The test plan document was reviewed for:

  • Accuracy of API function references against spytest/apis/switching/pvst.py
  • Accuracy of topology configurations against ansible/vars/topo_t0-isolated-d16u16s1.yml
  • Completeness of test coverage for PVST functionality

Any platform specific information?

N/A - This is a test plan document applicable to all platforms supporting PVST.

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

The test plan targets T0 topology with two_vlan_a and four_vlan_a configurations.

Documentation

This PR itself is documentation - a test plan for PVST functionality.


Link to Devin run: https://cisco-demo.devinenterprise.com/sessions/bdf0af5058584cdfa8d54c0d72cd2882
Requested by: Arthur Poon (arthur.poon@cognition.ai) / @arthurkkp-cog

This document provides a test plan for validating Per-VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST)
functionality in SONiC using the T0 topology configurations.

Includes:
- Overview of PVST protocol and variants (PVST/RPVST/MSTP)
- Test environment documentation for two_vlan_a and four_vlan_a topologies
- 21 comprehensive test cases covering:
  - Per-VLAN STP instance independence
  - Interface-specific PVST configuration
  - Topology change resilience
  - Protocol variant testing
  - Configuration persistence
- API reference for spytest/apis/switching/pvst.py functions
- Validation criteria and pass/fail definitions

Co-Authored-By: Arthur Poon <arthur.poon@windsurf.com>
@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants