feat: add JUnit XML exporter and --fail-under CI quality gate - #43
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this is
A rebase of #41 onto post-consolidation main. The original conflicted with #40 in cli.py; this branch carries the same change set resolved against the merged consolidation.
What it does
CI-native quality reporting: a junit output format (one testsuite per model, one testcase per golden-set entry; model API error maps to error, unjudged case maps to skipped so judging-disabled runs never false-pass, below-threshold judge score maps to failure) and a --fail-under CLI gate that exits with code 2 when any model's average judge score falls below the threshold. A model with no scores also fails the gate rather than silently passing. Stdlib xml.etree only, no new dependencies.
Validation
Attribution
Content originally authored in #41; that PR will be closed with a pointer here.