initial attempt at citation.cff for forest risks#56
initial attempt at citation.cff for forest risks#56norlandrhagen wants to merge 9 commits intocarbonplan:mainfrom
Conversation
citation.cff
Outdated
| year: 2021 | ||
| journal: bioRxiv | ||
| URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/13/2021.05.11.443688 | ||
| publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory | |
| publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this extra indentation intentional?
citation.cff
Outdated
| - name: "CarbonPlan Team" | ||
| - name: "Bill Anderegg (@anderegg)" | ||
| - name: "Grayson Badgley (@badgley)" | ||
| - name: "Anna Trugman" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's use the full author list here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741328
citation.cff
Outdated
| value: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741328 | ||
| - description: "forest-risks (data) Zenodo archive" | ||
| type: doi | ||
| value: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741332 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure what to do here. is this all we can add, or can we also add a description / authors?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added the author list as well as the description from Zenodo. I think we can add a bunch of fields.
https://github.com/citation-file-format/citation-file-format/blob/main/schema-guide.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is super helpful. I don't see repository as a key that takes a mapping though. So I think we need to rethink this section a bit. I'll write up some broader thoughts on the way this may go above.
Co-authored-by: Joe Hamman <jhamman1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Hamman <jhamman1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Hamman <jhamman1@gmail.com>
norlandrhagen
changed the title
jhamman
left a comment
jhamman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Getting close!
I think we basically want 3 blocks:
- main section (point to zenodo doi)
- preferred citation (I think this is fine as is)
- references section (links to related works, i.e. risks dataset).
So I think you are basically missing the references section (maybe just a type repository->references?)
citation.cff
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
remove extra blank lines (1 is okay)
citation.cff
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
remove extra blank lines (1 is okay)
citation.cff
Outdated
| value: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741328 | ||
| - description: "forest-risks (data) Zenodo archive" | ||
| type: doi | ||
| value: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741332 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is super helpful. I don't see repository as a key that takes a mapping though. So I think we need to rethink this section a bit. I'll write up some broader thoughts on the way this may go above.
citation.cff
Outdated
| given-names: "Joseph J." | ||
| orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-8439 | ||
| license: MIT, CC-BY-4.0 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add repository-code field here.
2 participants
No description provided.