refactor(pr-review-toolkit): simplify overlap sections and restructure report

pr-review-toolkit/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "pr-review-toolkit",
-  "version": "1.7.0",
+  "version": "1.8.0",
   "description": "Comprehensive PR review board using shared workflow context",
   "author": {
     "name": "cblecker",

pr-review-toolkit/README.md

@@ -106,17 +106,15 @@ The workflow returns a review board grouped by outcome:
 
 - `recommendedToPost` — high-signal findings that look postable by a human
   reviewer and are not already covered
-- `possiblePlusOnes` — existing threads where an endorsement may help
-- `partialOverlaps` — findings that add useful detail beyond an existing thread
+- `relatedToExisting` — findings that overlap or endorse existing review threads
 - `discussionOnly` — useful reviewer notes that should not be posted yet
 - `alreadyCovered` — findings fully covered by existing human or bot review
   threads
 - `discarded` — weak, duplicate, low-confidence, or non-actionable findings
 
 Each finding preserves the specialist's claim, evidence, reasoning, suggested
 fix, confidence, source lens, and existing-review overlap rationale. The board
-also includes positive observations, an action plan, coverage notes, PR metadata,
-and review metadata.
+also includes positive observations, PR metadata, and review metadata.
 
 ## Interaction And Posting
 
@@ -212,7 +210,7 @@ tools, local-git runs record manifest/full-diff provenance in
 `reviewMeta.sources`, and MCP fallback runs record the fallback reason and
 recovery counts. Also verify no generated parsing scripts are used, existing
 review context affects recommendations, the review board is understandable, the
-action plan is concise, drafts remain editable, and posting requires explicit
+drafts remain editable, and posting requires explicit
 approval.
 
 ## Prerequisites