-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
chore(#3d): delete the OpenCode substrate — Pydantic AI is the only agent runtime #254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
galanko
merged 14 commits into
feat/pa-migrate-normalizer
from
feat/pa-drop-opencode-substrate
Jun 3, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5bd2f92
refactor(settings): derive model + providers from canonical AI state
galanko 0052309
refactor(ai): drop the OpenCode auth.json dual-path
galanko 3f37e8e
refactor(main): drop the singleton OpenCode lifespan + dead process pool
galanko b3fba96
refactor(workspace): stop scaffolding opencode.json + .j2 agent templ…
galanko abc89cf
refactor(version): report the in-process substrate version, not OpenCode
galanko c33b644
chore: delete the OpenCode substrate
galanko c69b1fa
docs: update CLAUDE.md for the Pydantic AI substrate
galanko 6be4a28
docs: scrub stale OpenCode comments from the live code
galanko 8b29957
fix: address PR #254 review comments
galanko 5244765
refactor(cli): finish de-OpenCode'ing the CLI process management
galanko 95bbfc4
test(cli): assert the opencode doctor check is absent
galanko 6096910
test: regenerate OpenAPI snapshot for typed /settings/providers
galanko 398bdf8
fix(cli): doctor probes the configured app port, not the default
galanko aac1398
docs: scrub remaining OpenCode references from README, license + docs
galanko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update the private
cliff-osADR/IMPL docs in this change.This file now documents the new in-process substrate and canonical AI-state flow, but the PR notes say the matching
cliff-osdocs are deferred. For a substrate/runtime rewrite of this size, leaving the private architecture source of truth stale should block merge.As per coding guidelines, "All architectural changes must be documented via Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) in the private
cliff-os/docs/adr/directory. When behavior documented in an ADR or IMPL plan changes, update that documentation in the same change."Also applies to: 210-220
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed the private
cliff-osADR/IMPL-0022 docs need the same update — but that's the architect's surface in the private umbrella repo, not this public code PR (per the repo workflow,cliff-osdocs are updated via an architect pass, and this PR is build-mode). It's tracked as a follow-up alongside the cliff-os IMPL-0022 status update. The publicCLAUDE.mdin this PR is the user-facing source and is consistent with the new substrate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@galanko, that makes sense — the build/architect role separation is clear, and tracking it against IMPL-0022 is the right place for it. I'll defer to that workflow. No further action needed on this comment.