Skip to content

Image refresh for fedora-43#9025

Open
cockpituous wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
image-refresh-fedora-43-20260514-000420
Open

Image refresh for fedora-43#9025
cockpituous wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
image-refresh-fedora-43-20260514-000420

Conversation

@cockpituous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cockpituous cockpituous commented May 14, 2026

Last updated in 8f81e4e, 7 days ago.

  • image-refresh fedora-43

@cockpituous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/image-refresh fedora-43

@cockpituous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Task scheduled: issue-9025 image-refresh/fedora-43

Testing Farm link: https://artifacts.osci.redhat.com/testing-farm/78a34461-5104-4ebf-b93b-c4a4a71232fc

Job JSON
{
  "repo": "cockpit-project/bots",
  "sha": "f9ad77425201ebfee4955603490ea44114fbe9ca",
  "pull": null,
  "slug": "image-refresh-fedora-43-f9ad7742-20260513-233710",
  "context": "image-refresh/fedora-43",
  "command": [
    "./image-refresh",
    "--verbose",
    "--issue=9025",
    "fedora-43"
  ],
  "secrets": [
    "github-token",
    "image-upload"
  ]
}

@cockpituous cockpituous changed the title Image refresh for fedora-43 WIP: 23db05dd085a: [no-test] Image refresh for fedora-43 May 13, 2026
@cockpituous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cockpituous cockpituous force-pushed the image-refresh-fedora-43-20260514-000420 branch from c817897 to 7212cbc Compare May 14, 2026 00:04
@cockpituous cockpituous changed the title WIP: 23db05dd085a: [no-test] Image refresh for fedora-43 Image refresh for fedora-43 May 14, 2026
@cockpituous
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@martinpitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

stratis regression

presumabl from stratisd (3.8.6-2.fc43 -> 3.9.0-1.fc43) ? → Pilot board. @mvollmer as the pilot board has exploded, would you mind taking a look? A bit sad that this wasn't caught in our nightly tests?

@martinpitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The nightly tests actually did detect that, e.g. cockpit-project/cockpit#23253. They just have been ignored.

@martinpitt martinpitt moved this to detriment in Pilot tasks May 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: detriment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants