Conversation
9792f84 to
2e5cc2e
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1766 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 55.23% 85.10% +29.87%
===========================================
Files 46 46
Lines 8522 8522
Branches 1988 1988
===========================================
+ Hits 4707 7253 +2546
+ Misses 3316 802 -2514
+ Partials 499 467 -32 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Hmmm, curious. I saw the tests failing, they are on the same test file that I used. I picked the first test that failed for me, However, If so I will dig into the issue more and try to extract the part that loads the schemas from the |
d7d3c4e to
c5c247f
Compare
Small modifications to other tests: 1. `baseCommand: true` is invalid CWL, and unrelated to the scandep bugs that are being tested 2. for the content_types test, choose a different URL to avoid "429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for url" Co-authored-by: Michael R. Crusoe <michael.crusoe@gmail.com>
c5c247f to
8f29d0b
Compare
Closes #1765
Unit test fails for
main, and passes on this branch. The command from the issue reported also passes on this branch.Cheers,
-Bruno