Build llama.cpp b5289

[pb01ka]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

Summary

Sets the feedstock to build llama.cpp upstream tag b5289 (recipe version 5289).

This build fills a gap: b5289 is currently missing from conda-forge even though it is required by downstream packages such as llama-cpp-server-py-core.

The recipe's test suite had to be reconciled with what that older tree actually installs.

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/recipe.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/recipe.yaml:

• ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-recipe-manager. The recipe can only be automatically migrated to the new v1 format if it is parseable by conda-recipe-manager.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/29848348678. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

[pb01ka]

The tests are passing. I request the reviewers to please take a look at it. @frankier @jjerphan @jonashaag @pavelzw @traversaro @xhochy

@xhochy As per your earlier comment, should I switch osx_arm64_ and win_64_ to Azure runners? Please let me know. TY.

[xhochy]

@xhochy As per your conda-forge/rignore-feedstock#1 (comment), should I switch osx_arm64_ and win_64_ to Azure runners? Please let me know.

We should do this, but that should happen on main. I moved this to a special branch.

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

• linter: passed
• azure: passed
• github-actions: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!