Skip to content

[DOC-13867] Reciprocal Fusion Function - #665

Merged
rakhi-prathap merged 6 commits into
DOC-13938-encryption-at-restfrom
DOC-13867-reciprocal-fusion-function
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

[DOC-13867] Reciprocal Fusion Function#665
rakhi-prathap merged 6 commits into
DOC-13938-encryption-at-restfrom
DOC-13867-reciprocal-fusion-function

Conversation

@rakhi-prathap

@rakhi-prathap rakhi-prathap commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR to add a new SQL++ function - RECIPROCAL_FUSION().

Doc ticket: DOC-13867
Doc preview: RECIPROCAL_FUSION()

You will need the Docs Team credentials on Confluence.

NOTE: Base branch set to DOC-13938-encryption-at-rest considering this feature is going into the Totoro early release.

To Do:

  • Add links to RRF and RSF docs when available.

@rakhi-prathap
rakhi-prathap changed the base branch from release/8.1 to DOC-13938-encryption-at-rest July 16, 2026 09:12
@TusharMadaan04

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can we recheck with engineering if it is "union all" or "unionall" or both
In docs it is saying unionall, in enablement content it is "union all"

@sitaramv

Copy link
Copy Markdown

unionall only

@Pallavi-Janardhan
Pallavi-Janardhan self-requested a review July 22, 2026 13:31

@Pallavi-Janardhan Pallavi-Janardhan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@rakhi-prathap
rakhi-prathap merged commit 28ce5e0 into DOC-13938-encryption-at-rest Jul 22, 2026
@rakhi-prathap
rakhi-prathap deleted the DOC-13867-reciprocal-fusion-function branch July 22, 2026 14:09
@sitaramv

Copy link
Copy Markdown

isScore Default value is false, Can you correct it

@rakhi-prathap

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

isScore Default value is false, Can you correct it

Will do. Will create another PR for this fix. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants